Real state process
New York Unemployment Insurance
Unemployment claim • NYS Department of Labor
The New York State Department of Labor publishes the unemployment insurance process: a first claim, then a weekly certification for each week benefits are claimed.
Source: New York State Department of Labor
AccessForce is an independent prototype. It is not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, this agency, and it never changes eligibility requirements or makes eligibility decisions.
Before
The experience people use today
- One claim.
- Then a certification every single week.
Missing a week isn't a typo. It can mean no payment for that week.
The hardest part often isn't applying. It's sustaining a weekly process while dealing with everything else a job loss brings.
Which questions apply to you?
The same application asks for different question ranges depending on which programs someone is requesting.
- Laid offIdentity + employment history + separation reason+ weekly certification
- Hours reducedIdentity + partial work questions+ weekly earnings reporting
- Worked in more than one stateIdentity + multi-state employment questions+ agency follow-up
- Self-employed or contract workIdentity + work-type questions+ additional review
AI-identified cognitive and process complexity — not a legal accessibility violation.
Document preview
Representative excerptUnemployment insurance — first claim and weekly certification
First claim
- Provide identity, and employment history for the required period, including employer names and dates.
- State the reason your employment ended.
Ongoing requirements
- Certify each week to claim benefits for that week.
- Keep a record of your work search activities.
Weekly certification
- Answer questions about days worked, earnings and availability for work.
- Answers affect the payment for that week.
Short representative excerpts only — the full published document is linked above.
AXS — Accessibility Experience Score
Putting a number on the experience people face today
AXS — AccessForce Accessibility Experience Score
44 / 100
Illustrative score until audit completed
First claim plus weekly certification
AXS weighs technical accessibility at 40%, cognitive and content accessibility at 30%, and process accessibility at 30% — so an interface that is technically operable can still score low when the process itself is hard to get through.
How AXS worksAI accessibility audit
Ask AI to examine the experience
AccessForce reads the published application the way different people would have to, and reports what may stand in their way. These are AI-identified opportunities reviewed by a person — not legal findings.
AI redesign
Let Agentforce rebuild the interaction
The eligibility rules and the systems behind them stay exactly as they are. Only the interaction changes.
After
The same service, as a conversation
New York Unemployment Insurance — assistant
Hi. I can help you file an unemployment claim in New York. Before we start, how can I make this easier for you?
Before vs. after
Same public service, different experience
Before
Form-driven
- 📄 Long employment history from memory
- 🏛 Terms with legal meanings
- 📅 Weekly deadlines you must remember
- 🔀 Self-directed routing
- ⚠️ A missed week means no payment
After
Unemployment for All — conversation-driven
- 💬 Say what happened in your words
- 👀 See how your answer is recorded
- ≈ Approximate dates supported
- 🔔 Accessible weekly reminders
- 💾 Pause and resume
- ♿ Adaptive accessibility
- 🙋 Human help
Same eligibility rules. Same weekly requirement.
A process someone can keep up with.
Measured
Before and after isn't just visible. It's measurable.
Before
44
AXS / 100
Significant OpportunitiesFirst claim plus weekly certification
AccessForce redesign
After
93
AXS / 100
Highly Accessible ExperienceAdaptive Agentforce conversation over the same requirements
+0
Accessibility Experience Points
44 → 93. Illustrative score until audit completed.
Dimension by dimension
Select “Why?” on any dimension to see the finding, the recommendation and the redesign decisions the improvement is credited to.
| Dimension | Before | After | Change | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual & Perceivable | 76 out of 100 before | 95 out of 100 after | +19 | |
Severity: LowImpact area: Visual & Perceivable FindingDense pages ask people to scan long blocks of small print to find what applies to them. AccessForce recommendationPresent one question at a time, at a size and contrast the person can adjust.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Screen Reader & Semantic | 68 out of 100 before | 96 out of 100 after | +28 | |
Severity: MediumImpact area: Screen Reader & Semantic FindingDocument structure and field relationships are hard to follow when the experience is read aloud. AccessForce recommendationRebuild the interaction with real headings, labelled controls and a predictable reading order.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Motor & Keyboard | 64 out of 100 before | 96 out of 100 after | +32 | |
Severity: MediumImpact area: Motor & Keyboard FindingCompleting the experience assumes precise input and, on paper, handwriting and signatures. AccessForce recommendationMake every step keyboard-operable with large targets, and accept spoken answers.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Cognitive Accessibility | 26 out of 100 before | 91 out of 100 after | +65 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Cognitive Accessibility FindingA long employment history is requested from memory at one of the most stressful moments in a person's life. AccessForce recommendationAccept approximate dates, save progress, and allow details to be added later.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Plain Language | 30 out of 100 before | 94 out of 100 after | +64 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Plain Language FindingGovernment and legal terminology assumes familiarity most applicants don't have. AccessForce recommendationAsk in plain language and explain terms in place, while preserving the original meaning.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Process Accessibility | 20 out of 100 before | 89 out of 100 after | +69 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Process Accessibility FindingBenefits depend on a recurring weekly certification with its own deadlines. AccessForce recommendationExplain the weekly rhythm at the start, then send accessible reminders and allow certification by conversation.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Adaptive & Personalized | 30 out of 100 before | 94 out of 100 after | +64 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Adaptive & Personalized FindingThe experience is the same for everyone, and assistance has to be discovered before it can be used. AccessForce recommendationAsk about accessibility needs and language first, then adapt the experience to the answers.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
Illustrative score until audit completed. Each change is credited to a specific redesign decision — a score never moves simply because a conversation exists.
Why did the score change?
Process Accessibility
20 → 89+69
Why?
- Irrelevant questions removed from view
- Branching handled dynamically
- Save and resume added
- Help available throughout
- One task presented at a time
- Human escalation available
Cognitive Accessibility
26 → 91+65
Why?
- Reduced information density
- One question at a time
- Plain-language explanations
- “I don't know” supported
- Approximate answers supported where appropriate
- Follow-up items saved rather than blocking progress
Scale
One accessibility engine. Thousands of experiences.
The same audit-and-redesign engine can point at any required experience. The systems of record behind them are never replaced.
- Government
- Healthcare
- Education
- Employment
- Sports
- Travel
- Emergency Response
- Financial Services
Don't make people adapt to forms.
Make forms adapt to people.
AccessForce: Forms for All
Built for Agentforce for Good • AI Fluency Track • Type C