Real federal form
Applying for Federal Student Aid
FAFSA • Federal Student Aid
Federal Student Aid publishes the FAFSA form, the single application used to consider students for federal grants, work-study and loans.
Source: U.S. Department of Education, Federal Student Aid
AccessForce is an independent prototype. It is not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, this agency, and it never changes eligibility requirements or makes eligibility decisions.
Before
The experience people use today
- One application.
- Sometimes two or more people.
Whose information is required depends on answers the student has to work out first.
A student may have to determine their dependency status, identify contributors and coordinate other people's signatures before their own application can be submitted.
Which questions apply to you?
The same application asks for different question ranges depending on which programs someone is requesting.
- Independent studentStudent identity + student financials+ school list + signature
- Dependent student, parents marriedStudent sections + one contributor section+ contributor signature
- Dependent student, parents separatedStudent sections + the contributor rules that apply+ possible second contributor
- Student with unusual circumstancesStudent sections + special-circumstances questions+ school follow-up
AI-identified cognitive and process complexity — not a legal accessibility violation.
Document preview
Representative excerptFree Application for Federal Student Aid
Student identity
- Provide legal name, date of birth and Social Security number exactly as they appear on record.
- Create or sign in with a federal account before starting.
Dependency status
- Answer the dependency questions to determine whose financial information is required.
- If you are a dependent student, one or more contributors must also provide information and sign.
Financial information and schools
- Report or import tax information for the applicable year.
- List each school that should receive the application.
Short representative excerpts only — the full published document is linked above.
AXS — Accessibility Experience Score
Putting a number on the experience people face today
AXS — AccessForce Accessibility Experience Score
45 / 100
Illustrative score until audit completed
Free Application for Federal Student Aid
AXS weighs technical accessibility at 40%, cognitive and content accessibility at 30%, and process accessibility at 30% — so an interface that is technically operable can still score low when the process itself is hard to get through.
How AXS worksAI accessibility audit
Ask AI to examine the experience
AccessForce reads the published application the way different people would have to, and reports what may stand in their way. These are AI-identified opportunities reviewed by a person — not legal findings.
AI redesign
Let Agentforce rebuild the interaction
The eligibility rules and the systems behind them stay exactly as they are. Only the interaction changes.
After
The same service, as a conversation
Applying for Federal Student Aid — assistant
Hi. I can help you apply for federal student aid. Before we start, how can I make this easier for you?
Before vs. after
Same public service, different experience
Before
Form-driven
- 📄 Dependency questionnaire first
- 👥 Other people's accounts
- 🏛 Aid terminology
- 🔀 Self-directed routing
- ⏳ Stalls waiting on signatures
After
Student Aid for All — conversation-driven
- 💬 Describe your situation in your words
- 🤖 AI explains who else may need to help
- ✉️ Plain-language invitation for contributors
- 1️⃣ One question at a time
- 💾 Pause and resume
- ♿ Adaptive accessibility
- 🙋 Human help
Same aid rules. Same requirements.
An experience that keeps the student moving.
Measured
Before and after isn't just visible. It's measurable.
Before
45
AXS / 100
Significant OpportunitiesFree Application for Federal Student Aid
AccessForce redesign
After
94
AXS / 100
Highly Accessible ExperienceAdaptive Agentforce conversation over the same requirements
+0
Accessibility Experience Points
45 → 94. Illustrative score until audit completed.
Dimension by dimension
Select “Why?” on any dimension to see the finding, the recommendation and the redesign decisions the improvement is credited to.
| Dimension | Before | After | Change | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual & Perceivable | 78 out of 100 before | 95 out of 100 after | +17 | |
Severity: LowImpact area: Visual & Perceivable FindingDense pages ask people to scan long blocks of small print to find what applies to them. AccessForce recommendationPresent one question at a time, at a size and contrast the person can adjust.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Screen Reader & Semantic | 70 out of 100 before | 96 out of 100 after | +26 | |
Severity: LowImpact area: Screen Reader & Semantic FindingDocument structure and field relationships are hard to follow when the experience is read aloud. AccessForce recommendationRebuild the interaction with real headings, labelled controls and a predictable reading order.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Motor & Keyboard | 68 out of 100 before | 96 out of 100 after | +28 | |
Severity: MediumImpact area: Motor & Keyboard FindingCompleting the experience assumes precise input and, on paper, handwriting and signatures. AccessForce recommendationMake every step keyboard-operable with large targets, and accept spoken answers.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Cognitive Accessibility | 30 out of 100 before | 92 out of 100 after | +62 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Cognitive Accessibility FindingAn application can stall while waiting for another person's account and signature. AccessForce recommendationTrack each person's part separately and let the student invite a contributor with clear instructions.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Plain Language | 30 out of 100 before | 94 out of 100 after | +64 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Plain Language FindingGovernment and legal terminology assumes familiarity most applicants don't have. AccessForce recommendationAsk in plain language and explain terms in place, while preserving the original meaning.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Process Accessibility | 20 out of 100 before | 90 out of 100 after | +70 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Process Accessibility FindingDependency status determines whose financial information the application requires, and the student has to work it out first. AccessForce recommendationAsk about the student's living and family situation, then explain who may need to contribute and why.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Adaptive & Personalized | 30 out of 100 before | 94 out of 100 after | +64 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Adaptive & Personalized FindingThe experience is the same for everyone, and assistance has to be discovered before it can be used. AccessForce recommendationAsk about accessibility needs and language first, then adapt the experience to the answers.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
Illustrative score until audit completed. Each change is credited to a specific redesign decision — a score never moves simply because a conversation exists.
Why did the score change?
Process Accessibility
20 → 90+70
Why?
- Irrelevant questions removed from view
- Branching handled dynamically
- Save and resume added
- Help available throughout
- One task presented at a time
- Human escalation available
Cognitive Accessibility
30 → 92+62
Why?
- Reduced information density
- One question at a time
- Plain-language explanations
- “I don't know” supported
- Approximate answers supported where appropriate
- Follow-up items saved rather than blocking progress
Scale
One accessibility engine. Thousands of experiences.
The same audit-and-redesign engine can point at any required experience. The systems of record behind them are never replaced.
- Government
- Healthcare
- Education
- Employment
- Sports
- Travel
- Emergency Response
- Financial Services
Don't make people adapt to forms.
Make forms adapt to people.
AccessForce: Forms for All
Built for Agentforce for Good • AI Fluency Track • Type C