Real federal form
U.S. Citizenship
USCIS Form N-400 — Application for Naturalization
Form N-400 is the official application U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services publishes for naturalization.
Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
AccessForce is an independent prototype. It is not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, this agency, and it never changes eligibility requirements or makes eligibility decisions.
Before
The experience people use today
- Before completing the application, someone may first need to understand which eligibility path applies to them.
Eligibility basis, addresses, employment, travel, marital history, children and background questions all arrive at once.
Understanding the structure of the process becomes a task in itself, before any question gets answered.
Which questions apply to you?
The same application asks for different question ranges depending on which programs someone is requesting.
- Permanent resident long enoughEligibility basis + residence and employment history+ travel history + background questions
- Married to a U.S. citizenEligibility basis + marital history + spouse information+ residence, travel and background questions
- U.S. military serviceEligibility basis + service information+ residence and background questions
- Qualifying employment abroadEligibility basis + employment and travel history+ residence and background questions
AI-identified cognitive and process complexity — not a legal accessibility violation.
Document preview
Representative excerptForm N-400 — Application for Naturalization
Eligibility and identity
- Indicate the basis on which you are applying for naturalization.
- Provide names, dates of birth and permanent resident information.
History
- List addresses and employment for the required reporting period.
- List trips outside the United States, marital history and children.
Background and certification
- Answer the background questions.
- Signature, date and applicant certification.
Short representative excerpts only — the full published document is linked above.
AXS — Accessibility Experience Score
Putting a number on the experience people face today
AXS — AccessForce Accessibility Experience Score
39 / 100
Illustrative score until audit completed
USCIS Form N-400, Application for Naturalization
AXS weighs technical accessibility at 40%, cognitive and content accessibility at 30%, and process accessibility at 30% — so an interface that is technically operable can still score low when the process itself is hard to get through.
How AXS worksAI accessibility audit
Ask AI to examine the experience
AccessForce reads the published application the way different people would have to, and reports what may stand in their way. These are AI-identified opportunities reviewed by a person — not legal findings.
AI redesign
Let Agentforce rebuild the interaction
The eligibility rules and the systems behind them stay exactly as they are. Only the interaction changes.
After
The same service, as a conversation
U.S. Citizenship — assistant
Welcome. I'll help you understand and work through the naturalization application one step at a time.
Before vs. after
Same public service, different experience
Before
Form-oriented
- 📄 Form-oriented
- 🔀 Eligibility pathways
- 🧠 Historical recall
- 🏛 Legal terminology
- ⌨️ Structured fields
After
Conversational
- 💬 Conversational
- 🤖 AI-guided branching
- ≈ Approximate information supported
- 🧠 Plain language
- 🌎 Language assistance
- 💾 Follow-up items
- ♿ Adaptive
- 🙋 Human escalation
Same law. Same eligibility requirements.
An experience someone can actually get through.
Measured
Before and after isn't just visible. It's measurable.
Before
39
AXS / 100
Major Barriers IdentifiedUSCIS Form N-400, Application for Naturalization
AccessForce redesign
After
92
AXS / 100
Highly Accessible ExperienceAdaptive Agentforce conversation over the same requirements
+0
Accessibility Experience Points
39 → 92. Illustrative score until audit completed.
Dimension by dimension
Select “Why?” on any dimension to see the finding, the recommendation and the redesign decisions the improvement is credited to.
| Dimension | Before | After | Change | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual & Perceivable | 70 out of 100 before | 93 out of 100 after | +23 | |
Severity: LowImpact area: Visual & Perceivable FindingDense pages ask people to scan long blocks of small print to find what applies to them. AccessForce recommendationPresent one question at a time, at a size and contrast the person can adjust.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Screen Reader & Semantic | 62 out of 100 before | 95 out of 100 after | +33 | |
Severity: MediumImpact area: Screen Reader & Semantic FindingHistorical information must be mapped into structured fields. AccessForce recommendationAllow natural-language descriptions and have AI structure the information for applicant confirmation.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Motor & Keyboard | 60 out of 100 before | 94 out of 100 after | +34 | |
Severity: MediumImpact area: Motor & Keyboard FindingCompleting the experience assumes precise input and, on paper, handwriting and signatures. AccessForce recommendationMake every step keyboard-operable with large targets, and accept spoken answers.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Cognitive Accessibility | 24 out of 100 before | 90 out of 100 after | +66 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Cognitive Accessibility FindingApplicants may need to recall historical addresses, employment, travel and family information. AccessForce recommendationCollect historical information conversationally and allow unresolved dates to be flagged for follow-up.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Plain Language | 22 out of 100 before | 92 out of 100 after | +70 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Plain Language FindingLegal and immigration terminology may be unfamiliar. AccessForce recommendationProvide plain-language explanations while preserving the original legal meaning.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Process Accessibility | 18 out of 100 before | 88 out of 100 after | +70 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Process Accessibility FindingApplicants may need to understand naturalization eligibility categories before determining the relevant path. AccessForce recommendationAsk plain-language questions and guide applicants toward the potentially relevant application path.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Adaptive & Personalized | 24 out of 100 before | 92 out of 100 after | +68 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Adaptive & Personalized FindingThe experience is the same for everyone, and assistance has to be discovered before it can be used. AccessForce recommendationAsk about accessibility needs and language first, then adapt the experience to the answers.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
Illustrative score until audit completed. Each change is credited to a specific redesign decision — a score never moves simply because a conversation exists.
Why did the score change?
Process Accessibility
18 → 88+70
Why?
- Irrelevant questions removed from view
- Branching handled dynamically
- Save and resume added
- Help available throughout
- One task presented at a time
- Human escalation available
Cognitive Accessibility
24 → 90+66
Why?
- Reduced information density
- One question at a time
- Plain-language explanations
- “I don't know” supported
- Approximate answers supported where appropriate
- Follow-up items saved rather than blocking progress
Scale
One accessibility engine. Thousands of experiences.
The same audit-and-redesign engine can point at any required experience. The systems of record behind them are never replaced.
- Government
- Healthcare
- Education
- Employment
- Sports
- Travel
- Emergency Response
- Financial Services
Don't make people adapt to forms.
Make forms adapt to people.
AccessForce: Forms for All
Built for Agentforce for Good • AI Fluency Track • Type C