Real federal process
Filing a Federal Tax Return
IRS Free File • Form 1040
The IRS publishes Form 1040 for individual federal income tax returns, along with free filing options for people under an income threshold.
Source: Internal Revenue Service
AccessForce is an independent prototype. It is not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, this agency, and it never changes eligibility requirements or makes eligibility decisions.
Before
The experience people use today
- One return.
- Three numbered schedules.
- Dozens of possible credits.
Most people only need a small part of it — but the form doesn't know which part.
Before entering a single number, someone may need to decide their filing status, which schedules apply and whether they qualify for a free filing option.
Which questions apply to you?
The same application asks for different question ranges depending on which programs someone is requesting.
- Wages only, standard deductionForm 1040 core lines+ signature
- Self-employment incomeForm 1040 + Schedule 1 + Schedule 2+ Schedule SE
- Claiming education creditsForm 1040 + Schedule 3+ Form 8863
- Claiming the Earned Income CreditForm 1040 + credit worksheets+ Schedule EIC if children are claimed
AI-identified cognitive and process complexity — not a legal accessibility violation.
Document preview
Representative excerptForm 1040 — U.S. Individual Income Tax Return
Filing status and dependants
- Check one filing status. Some statuses require additional qualifying tests.
- List dependants and indicate which credits each may relate to.
Income lines and schedules
- Enter wages, interest, and other income; several lines refer you to a separate schedule.
- Attach Schedule 1, 2 or 3 if the referenced situations apply to you.
Credits, payments and result
- Enter deductions and credits, then compute the refund or amount owed.
- Sign and date, or provide an electronic filing PIN.
Short representative excerpts only — the full published document is linked above.
AXS — Accessibility Experience Score
Putting a number on the experience people face today
AXS — AccessForce Accessibility Experience Score
42 / 100
Illustrative score until audit completed
IRS Form 1040 and the Free File options
AXS weighs technical accessibility at 40%, cognitive and content accessibility at 30%, and process accessibility at 30% — so an interface that is technically operable can still score low when the process itself is hard to get through.
How AXS worksAI accessibility audit
Ask AI to examine the experience
AccessForce reads the published application the way different people would have to, and reports what may stand in their way. These are AI-identified opportunities reviewed by a person — not legal findings.
AI redesign
Let Agentforce rebuild the interaction
The eligibility rules and the systems behind them stay exactly as they are. Only the interaction changes.
After
The same service, as a conversation
Filing a Federal Tax Return — assistant
Hi. I can help you work through your federal tax return. Before we start, how can I make this easier for you?
Before vs. after
Same public service, different experience
Before
Form-driven
- 📄 Numbered lines and schedules
- 🏛 Tax terminology
- 🔀 Self-directed routing
- 📁 Scattered statements
- 🧮 Manual calculation
After
Taxes for All — conversation-driven
- 💬 Describe your year in your words
- 1️⃣ One question at a time
- 🧠 Plain language explanations
- 🤖 AI-assembled schedules
- 📁 Document reading and checklist
- 💾 Pause and resume
- ♿ Adaptive accessibility
- 🙋 Human help
Same tax law. Same obligations.
An experience that adapts to the filer.
Measured
Before and after isn't just visible. It's measurable.
Before
42
AXS / 100
Significant OpportunitiesIRS Form 1040 and the Free File options
AccessForce redesign
After
93
AXS / 100
Highly Accessible ExperienceAdaptive Agentforce conversation over the same requirements
+0
Accessibility Experience Points
42 → 93. Illustrative score until audit completed.
Dimension by dimension
Select “Why?” on any dimension to see the finding, the recommendation and the redesign decisions the improvement is credited to.
| Dimension | Before | After | Change | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual & Perceivable | 74 out of 100 before | 94 out of 100 after | +20 | |
Severity: LowImpact area: Visual & Perceivable FindingDense pages ask people to scan long blocks of small print to find what applies to them. AccessForce recommendationPresent one question at a time, at a size and contrast the person can adjust.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Screen Reader & Semantic | 66 out of 100 before | 95 out of 100 after | +29 | |
Severity: MediumImpact area: Screen Reader & Semantic FindingDocument structure and field relationships are hard to follow when the experience is read aloud. AccessForce recommendationRebuild the interaction with real headings, labelled controls and a predictable reading order.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Motor & Keyboard | 62 out of 100 before | 95 out of 100 after | +33 | |
Severity: MediumImpact area: Motor & Keyboard FindingCompleting the experience assumes precise input and, on paper, handwriting and signatures. AccessForce recommendationMake every step keyboard-operable with large targets, and accept spoken answers.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Cognitive Accessibility | 26 out of 100 before | 90 out of 100 after | +64 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Cognitive Accessibility FindingApplicants must remember substantial historical information while navigating the application. AccessForce recommendationBreak the process into smaller steps, allow approximate answers where appropriate, save unresolved information and return to it later.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Plain Language | 24 out of 100 before | 93 out of 100 after | +69 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Plain Language FindingTax terminology appears at the exact moment a number has to be entered correctly. AccessForce recommendationExplain each term in place, in everyday words, without changing what the law requires.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Process Accessibility | 22 out of 100 before | 89 out of 100 after | +67 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Process Accessibility FindingLine-level references send people to separate schedules to find out whether a line applies. AccessForce recommendationAsk about the person's year in plain language and assemble the relevant schedules behind the scenes.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
| Adaptive & Personalized | 28 out of 100 before | 93 out of 100 after | +65 | |
Severity: HighImpact area: Adaptive & Personalized FindingThe experience is the same for everyone, and assistance has to be discovered before it can be used. AccessForce recommendationAsk about accessibility needs and language first, then adapt the experience to the answers.
Why did the score change?
| ||||
Illustrative score until audit completed. Each change is credited to a specific redesign decision — a score never moves simply because a conversation exists.
Why did the score change?
Process Accessibility
22 → 89+67
Why?
- Irrelevant questions removed from view
- Branching handled dynamically
- Save and resume added
- Help available throughout
- One task presented at a time
- Human escalation available
Cognitive Accessibility
26 → 90+64
Why?
- Reduced information density
- One question at a time
- Plain-language explanations
- “I don't know” supported
- Approximate answers supported where appropriate
- Follow-up items saved rather than blocking progress
Scale
One accessibility engine. Thousands of experiences.
The same audit-and-redesign engine can point at any required experience. The systems of record behind them are never replaced.
- Government
- Healthcare
- Education
- Employment
- Sports
- Travel
- Emergency Response
- Financial Services
Don't make people adapt to forms.
Make forms adapt to people.
AccessForce: Forms for All
Built for Agentforce for Good • AI Fluency Track • Type C